Vyberte stránku

A company`s shares are often held by the company`s directors, senior executives and/or key employees. If they resign or leave for any reason, you will more than likely want them to sell their shares, otherwise they could continue to be entitled to dividends that would be generated by the shareholders in the works. This fair remedy, like other fair remedies, is of importance of assessment. When granted, the court orders the re-establishing the status quo ante, that is, the position in which the parties placed themselves before the contract, whereas when a contract is revoked for violation, the effect is not retroactive. This method is often used in relation to errors and misrepresentations. It can be a very important instrument in a shareholders` pact, in which the best solution might be to allow the parties to leave. While these acts are sometimes found to be valid when other shareholders can prove that the complaint caused them a loss, they may invoke a breach of contract against the instigator of the offensive act. One of the most common methods of proving a lawsuit caused a loss to a shareholder by arguing that it resulted in a depreciation of the shareholders` shares. In this case, several measures can be taken if the measure is contrary to the agreement, including the suspension of the voting rights of aggrieved shareholders or the recovery of damages to the party or the aggrieved parties. In extreme cases, this may even give rise to a court injunction requiring the defaulting shareholder to obtain an action such as the transfer of his shares. This term means “as much as the person wins” and is, in some cases, an alternative to damage. This remedy arises when a person brings benefits in the belief that the contract exists, if not legally; or if a defendant prevents a plaintiff from entering into the contract. It occurs when a person provides benefits in the belief that a contract exists, if not legally; or if the defendant prevents the plaintiff from entering into the contract.

This remedy is often related to benefits that the defendant receives but are not paid. For example, the violation of a negative provision in a contract may be limited by an injunction. Its use is very limited in trade restriction, where it is often coupled the most effective remedy, even if related to a claim for compensation and in areas such as copyright infringement and patent infringement. The general capital rules applicable to the granting or not to the particular benefit generally apply to omission. Another method is a specific benefit, which is a remedy that can only be issued by a court order, and requires the party who violates the violation to work in accordance with the terms of the contract. A special benefit is a fair remedy that is granted only at the discretion of the Tribunal. Beyond the data protection element, companies with complex decision-making mechanisms designed to protect the interests of multiple shareholders can benefit from a bargaining advantage to a potential party that reads the Constitution because of the awareness of the internal power dynamics of the company.